A four-session guide through the full episode — the Christmas thread, fear and faith, the Book of Enoch, and how we got the Bible.
Based on:Live Free with Josh HowertonHosts: Josh Howerton · Paul Cunningham · Carlos ErazoRuntime: ~98 min
This is an independent study & discussion guide, prepared by a listener as a free resource for small
groups. It summarizes and organizes the ideas discussed on the podcast episode above; it is not official
material of, nor endorsed by, Lakepointe Church or the Live Free podcast, and all spoken content and ideas
belong to the hosts. Scripture references are gathered for your own study — the whole point is to open your
Bible and check everything for yourself.
This episode ranges wide — it opens with Christmas "deep cuts," turns to fear and faith, then tackles
the two questions in the title: Was the Book of Enoch really removed from the Bible? and How was the
Bible actually put together? This guide breaks the conversation into four sessions you can do in one long
sitting or across four weeks. Each session has the big idea, a short recap, the passages to look up, discussion
questions, and a way to live it out.
How to use this guide
Watch or listen to the section (timestamps are provided), then work through it together with
Bibles open. Don't rush to the answers — the richest part is looking up each passage and asking, "Does the
text actually say this?" That habit is the real takeaway of the whole episode.
Session One
The Christmas Deep Cuts
The Scarlet Thread
▶ approx. 8:40 – 36:00
Before the big topics, the hosts trace what theologians call the scarlet thread — the slain lamb that runs
from the first pages of Genesis all the way to the cross, and lands right in the manger. The claim: the Christmas
story is packed with sacrificial-lamb imagery that no human author could have coordinated across 1,500 years.
Key points
Healing in his wings. Malachi's last prophecy promises a Messiah with "healing in his wings." The Hebrew
kanaf means both "wing" and the "fringe/edge" of a garment — so when the woman with the issue of blood
reaches for the fringe of Jesus' robe, she's acting on Malachi's promise.
Bethlehem = "house of bread" — fitting for the One who calls Himself the bread of life.
Why shepherds? They were the lowest social rung (their testimony wasn't even valid in court). God
announces the birth to the lowly — "the humble are in, the proud are out."
The lamb, start to finish: the skins that cover Adam and Eve (Gen 3); the ram that spares Isaac (Gen 22);
the Passover blood on the doorposts (Exod 12); the Day of Atonement lamb (Lev 16); the shepherds who raised
the sacrificial lambs; Jesus laid in a manger like a newborn lamb; "Behold, the Lamb of God" (John 1:29); the
Last Supper where every Passover element is named except the lamb — because the Lamb is at the table.
The one cry. Jesus never cries out under torture, but does when darkness falls and He is forsaken
(Mark 15:34) — the moment the temple curtain tears from top to bottom.
Dig into the Word
Luke 2:1–20
Malachi 4:2
Mark 5:25–34
Genesis 3:21
Genesis 22:1–14
Exodus 12:1–13
Leviticus 16
John 1:29
Mark 15:33–38
Discussion
Read Luke 2:8–20. Why do you think God announced the birth to shepherds instead of kings or priests? Where
do you see that same pattern in your own story?
Trace the "lamb" from Genesis 22 to John 1:29 to the cross. What does it change about how you read the
Christmas story to see it this way?
The woman in Mark 5 acted on a promise she'd read in Malachi. What promise from Scripture are you currently
reaching out to hold?
Live it out
Pick one "thread" passage this week and read it
slowly, asking how it points to Christ. Bring one thing you noticed back to the group.
"Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world."John 1:29
Session Two
The Practical Heart of the Episode
Fear Not
▶ approx. 36:34 – 45:00
"Fear not" appears roughly 365 times in Scripture — and the hosts insist it's a command, not a suggestion.
A Christian is meant to carry one controlling fear (the fear of God), which drives out the fear of everything else.
Key points
Take every thought captive. Josh's picture: interrogate each thought like a border agent — "Who sent
you, and what kingdom are you from?" Some thoughts you assume are yours (or even God's) originate in "the kingdom
of darkness."
Fear looks out; faith looks up. Fear listens to the world; faith listens to the Word.
Order matters: facts → faith → feelings. Most people invert it — putting feelings first, then treating
the feeling as the fact. Set your mind on what's true; let the feelings catch up (or not).
Chesterton: Jesus promised His followers they'd be "completely fearless, absurdly happy, and in constant
trouble."
Dig into the Word
2 Corinthians 10:5
2 Timothy 1:7
Isaiah 41:10
Philippians 4:6–8
Proverbs 9:10
Discussion
What's one recurring fearful or anxious thought you tend to accept without questioning? Run it through the
"who sent you?" test out loud.
Read 2 Timothy 1:7. What does it mean, practically, that fear is not the spirit God gave you?
"Facts → faith → feelings." Where in your life have you had that order backwards this month?
Live it out
Choose one promise of God, write it down, and
make it "the wallpaper of your life" this week — memorize it and return to it whenever fear speaks.
"For God gave us a spirit not of fear, but of power and love and self-control."2 Timothy 1:7
Session Three
The Headline Question
Was the Book of Enoch Banned?
▶ approx. 45:19 – 70:00
Sparked by a viral Joe Rogan clip and a wave of listener comments, Paul Cunningham (the resident theologian) walks
through what the Book of Enoch is, why it isn't in the Bible, and why the popular "they banned it" story doesn't hold
up. The core line: you can't ban what was never in.
Key points
What it is. A writing compiled roughly 300–100 BC, focused on angels and demons. It's
pseudepigraphal — falsely attributed to Enoch (Noah's great-grandfather), not actually written by him.
Never in, so never removed. Not in the Hebrew Bible, not in the Greek Septuagint, not in the Catholic
Apocrypha. It's canonical in exactly one tradition — Ethiopian Orthodoxy — which is not the "oldest
Bible" (the oldest complete Ethiopian Bible is medieval; the Vulgate and Codex Vaticanus are centuries older).
Two reasons everyone else rejected it: (1) it's falsely attributed and too far removed from the events;
(2) it contradicts Scripture (its timeline of the angelic "fall" doesn't line up with Genesis).
"But Jude quotes it!" True — Jude 14–15 quotes 1 Enoch 1:9. The key distinction: inspired vs. true.
Everything inspired is true, but something true isn't necessarily inspired — and quoting a true line
doesn't make the whole source Scripture. (Paul does the same thing quoting a pagan poet in Acts 17 and Titus 1.)
The Dead Sea Scrolls point. Yes, Qumran had Enoch alongside Isaiah — but they wrote authoritative
commentary (Pesher) on Isaiah and the Torah, and not on Enoch. A book on the shelf isn't the same as
a book counted as Scripture.
Dig into the Word
Genesis 6:1–4
Jude 14–15
Acts 17:28
Titus 1:12–13
Deuteronomy 29:29
1 Timothy 1:3–7
Three warnings from the hosts
By what criteria? If you reject the whole Jewish and Christian consensus, what's your standard? If you
just keep what you like, "your God becomes a lot like you."
Don't chase the hidden and neglect the revealed (Deut 29:29). There's a vast God to know; don't camp on
the shore speculating about the unknowable.
Scripture warns against exactly this (1 Tim 1:4) — "myths and endless genealogies." Paul's gut-check:
"If you knew who the Nephilim were tomorrow, what would it change about your relationship with Jesus?"
Discussion
Read Jude 14–15, then read the "inspired vs. true" distinction again. Why is that difference so important —
and where else have you seen people confuse the two?
Read Deuteronomy 29:29. What's one "secret thing" you've spent energy on that the passage would gently
redirect? What "revealed thing" could that energy go toward instead?
Be honest: what's the pull of books like Enoch or topics like the Nephilim? What need is it meeting — and does
Christ meet that need better?
"The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever."Deuteronomy 29:29
Session Four
The Second Headline
How We Got the Bible
▶ approx. 70:27 – 96:00
The hosts react to a viral 15-million-view video that, in Josh's words, "takes every myth about the Bible's origins
and throws them at you at once." They answer it claim by claim — a useful field guide, because you will hear
these again.
The claims, and the responses
"Jesus wasn't a Christian, He was a Jew." True but trivial. He came not to start a religion but to
fulfill the Law and the Prophets (Matt 5:17) and establish a new covenant (Luke 22:20).
"The Bible didn't exist when Jesus walked the earth." Of course not — the New Testament records
His life and can't be written before it happens. Jesus had a Bible (the Old Testament) and foretold the New
(John 16:13); Peter already calls Paul's letters "Scripture" (2 Pet 3:15–16).
"Compiled centuries later by a pagan emperor (Constantine) for political reasons." False. The Council of
Nicaea (325) left 20 rulings — none about which books are Scripture; it debated the deity of Christ. The
canon was recognized, not invented — and the councils that affirmed it (Carthage, 397) had no emperor
present.
"Just flawed men wrote it — telephone game." The manuscript evidence is the opposite of a telephone
game: ~6,000 ancient Greek New Testament copies, within a century of the events, agreeing to over 99.5% — with the
variants openly footnoted and none touching doctrine.
"The Old Testament God isn't the same as Jesus." That's the ancient heresy Marcionism. Both
Testaments hold judgment and mercy; Jesus never rebuked the God of the Old Testament — He claimed to
be Him ("before Abraham was, I am," John 8:58).
"The point was never the pages, it was the person — follow Me." And how do you learn to follow the
person? You read the pages. If the book can't be trusted, neither can the verse that says "follow me."
Dig into the Word
Matthew 5:17–18
Luke 22:20
John 14:6
John 16:13
2 Peter 3:15–16
John 5:39–40
2 Timothy 3:16
John 8:58
Discussion
Which of these six myths have you actually heard (or believed) before? How would you answer it now?
Read John 5:39–40. Jesus warns against loving the Scriptures while missing the One they point to. How do you
guard against turning Bible knowledge into an end in itself?
The video says "follow the person, not the pages." Why is that a false choice? How do the pages and the Person
actually relate?
Going deeper — one detail the episode skipped
The hosts mention that Athanasius, in 367 AD, listed the 27 New Testament books —
but they never name the document. It's Athanasius's 39th Festal Letter, also called the Easter Letter
(festal letters were annual letters announcing the date of Easter). It contains the first surviving list of exactly
our 27 New Testament books — arguably the single most important document for the New Testament canon, and a great
piece of evidence for the "recognized, not invented" point. Pair it with the Council of Carthage (397) and
the fact that church fathers like Irenaeus (~180 AD) were already quoting nearly the whole New Testament as
Scripture within a lifetime of the apostles.
Manuscript comparison worth looking up: Plato (~7 copies, 1,200-year gap), Julius Caesar
(~10 copies, 1,000-year gap), Aristotle (~49 copies, 1,400-year gap) — versus the New Testament (~6,000 Greek
copies within <100 years).
"All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness."2 Timothy 3:16
Wrapping Up
Two questions, one answer. The Book of Enoch was never "banned" because it was never in the Bible; the Bible wasn't
invented by an emperor but recognized by the church over time — and both stories point the same direction: we can
trust the book we've been given. The recurring caution across the whole episode is the same one, too: don't chase
what's hidden and speculative at the expense of knowing the God who has actually revealed Himself.
Closing questions
Across all four sessions, which single passage most surprised you when you looked it up yourself?
What's one "shore-standing" speculation you're ready to trade for time in a passage that's clearly revealed?
How will you answer the next person who tells you the Bible was "banned," "voted on," or "corrupted"?